Valambhia, et al. v United Republic of Tanzania, et al.

On March 31, 2019 the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia granted the motion to dismiss that Foley Hoag brought on behalf of its client, the United Republic of Tanzania, in Valambhia, et al. v United Republic of Tanzania, et al. (No. 18-cv-370 (TSC)).

The case was initiated in February 2018 by the widow and children of the late Devram Valambhia, who sought recognition of a money judgment obtained in Tanzanian courts. The Tanzanian judgment at issue was the result of a long, highly-publicized series of court cases that lasted over fourteen years and was dubbed in the Tanzanian media as “the most expensive legal suit in Dar’s history.” Including interests and costs, Valambhia’s decedents sought nearly $120 million.

Tanzania moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint in June 2018, arguing that none of the exceptions to its sovereign immunity provided in the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) applied to plaintiffs’ recognition action. Plaintiffs argued that because the Tanzanian judgments at issue grew out of a contract dispute, their case was sufficiently based on a commercial activity to deprive Tanzania of its sovereign immunity.

In its March 31, 2019 Memorandum Opinion, the Court rejected plaintiffs’ argument and agreed with Tanzania. It reasoned that although the Tanzanian judgments ultimately grew out of a commercial activity, plaintiffs’ recognition action was not “based upon” that activity as the FSIA requires.

Foley Hoag partners Lawrence Martin (Picture) and Clara Brillembourg led the team defending Tanzania, with the assistance of associate Nicholas Renzler and Nick Anastasi.

Involved fees earner: Nicholas Anastasi – Foley Hoag; Clara Brillembourg – Foley Hoag; Lawrence Martin – Foley Hoag; Nicholas Renzler – Foley Hoag;

Law Firms: Foley Hoag;

Clients: United Republic of Tanzania;

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Author: Ambrogio Visconti