Chester County Employees Retirement Fund v. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP successfully represented the class action.

On April 29, 2021, the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division, First Department, upheld the trial court’s denial of a motion to dismiss brought by defendants in a securities class action against Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The operative complaint alleges that Alnylam, along with its officers, directors, and underwriters, violated §§11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 by making positive statements and omissions in the registration statement for Alnylam’s November 14, 2017 secondary offering regarding patisiran, an RNAi therapeutic drug that treats patients with hereditary TTR-mediated amyloidosis, a disease that manifests as polyneuropathy, cardiomyopathy, or both.

According to the complaint, the key clinical study for patisiran did not generate any data supporting a conclusion that the drug was effective at treating cardiomyopathy. This means that defendants lacked a reasonable basis for their positive statements, such as that patisiran “achieved significant effects” in treating cardiomyopathy. Ultimately, the FDA approved the drug, but for polyneuropathy only, and found that the study failed to generate any efficacy data for cardiomyopathy. Thus, the registration statement for the offering was inaccurate and misleading, containing untrue statements of material facts and omitting to state other facts necessary to make these statements not misleading.

The Robbins team was led by Michael Capeci (Picture) and included Douglas Wilens and Samuel H. Rudman. 

 

Involved fees earner: Michael Capeci – Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd; Samuel Rudman – Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd; Douglas Wilens – Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd;

Law Firms: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd;

Clients: Chester County Employees Retirement Fund;

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Martina Bellini

Author: Martina Bellini

Chester County Employees Retirement Fund v. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP successfully represented the class action.

On April 29, 2021, the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division, First Department, upheld the trial court’s denial of a motion to dismiss brought by defendants in a securities class action against Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The operative complaint alleges that Alnylam, along with its officers, directors, and underwriters, violated §§11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 by making positive statements and omissions in the registration statement for Alnylam’s November 14, 2017 secondary offering regarding patisiran, an RNAi therapeutic drug that treats patients with hereditary TTR-mediated amyloidosis, a disease that manifests as polyneuropathy, cardiomyopathy, or both.

According to the complaint, the key clinical study for patisiran did not generate any data supporting a conclusion that the drug was effective at treating cardiomyopathy. This means that defendants lacked a reasonable basis for their positive statements, such as that patisiran “achieved significant effects” in treating cardiomyopathy. Ultimately, the FDA approved the drug, but for polyneuropathy only, and found that the study failed to generate any efficacy data for cardiomyopathy. Thus, the registration statement for the offering was inaccurate and misleading, containing untrue statements of material facts and omitting to state other facts necessary to make these statements not misleading.

The Robbins team was led by Michael Capeci (Picture) and included Douglas Wilens and Samuel H. Rudman. 

 

Involved fees earner: Michael Capeci – Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd; Samuel Rudman – Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd; Douglas Wilens – Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd;

Law Firms: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd;

Clients: Chester County Employees Retirement Fund;

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Martina Bellini

Author: Martina Bellini